Random effect meta-analysis for correlated test statistics using RE2C
Arguments
- beta
regression coefficients from each analysis
- stders
standard errors corresponding to betas
- cor
correlation matrix between of test statistics. Default considers uncorrelated test statistics
- twoStep
Apply two step version of RE2C that is designed to be applied only after the fixed effect model.
Value
- stat1:
statistic testing effect mean
- stat2:
statistic testing effect heterogeneity
- RE2Cp:
RE2 p-value accounting for correlelation between tests
- RE2Cp.twoStep:
two step RE2C test after fixed effect test. Only evaluated if
twoStep==TRUE
- QE:
test statistic for the test of (residual) heterogeneity
- QEp:
p-value for the test of (residual) heterogeneity
- Isq:
I^2 statistic
Details
Perform random effect meta-analysis for correlated test statistics using RE2 method of Han and Eskin (2011) , or RE2 for correlated test statistics from Han et al. (2016) . Also uses RE2C method of Lee et al. (2017) to further test for heterogenity in effect size. By default, correlation is set to identity matrix to for independent test statistics.
This method requires the correlation matrix to be symmatric positive definite (SPD). If this condition is not satisfied, results will be NA. If the matrix is not SPD, there is likely an issue with how it was generated.
For computing Q
, QEp
, and Isq
, the effective number of independent studies is determined by sum(solve(cor))
(Liu and Liang 1997)
. When the correlation is diagonal, the studies are independent and this value is simply the number of studies.
References
Han B, Duong D, Sul JH, de Bakker PI, Eskin E, Raychaudhuri S (2016).
“A general framework for meta-analyzing dependent studies with overlapping subjects in association mapping.”
Human Molecular Genetics, 25(9), 1857--1866.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw049.
Han B, Eskin E (2011).
“Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.”
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 88(5), 586--598.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014.
Lee CH, Eskin E, Han B (2017).
“Increasing the power of meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to detect heterogeneous effects.”
Bioinformatics, 33(14), i379--i388.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx242.
Liu G, Liang K (1997).
“Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations.”
Biometrics, 937--947.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2533554.
Examples
library(clusterGeneration)
library(mvtnorm)
# sample size
n = 30
# number of response variables
m = 6
# Error covariance
Sigma = genPositiveDefMat(m)$Sigma
# regression parameters
beta = matrix(.6, 1, m)
# covariates
X = matrix(rnorm(n), ncol=1)
# Simulate response variables
Y = X %*% beta + rmvnorm(n, sigma = Sigma)
# Multivariate regression
fit = lm(Y ~ X)
# Correlation between residuals
C = cor(residuals(fit))
# Extract effect sizes and standard errors from model fit
df = lapply(coef(summary(fit)), function(a)
data.frame(beta = a["X", 1], se = a["X", 2]))
df = do.call(rbind, df)
# Run fixed effects meta-analysis,
# assume identity correlation
LS( df$beta, df$se)
#> beta se p
#> 1 1.166358 0.1464346 1.651602e-15
# Run random effects meta-analysis,
# assume identity correlation
RE2C( df$beta, df$se)
#> stat1 stat2 RE2Cp RE2Cp.twoStep QE QEp Isq
#> 1 63.44198 0.02154174 6.196746e-15 NA 5.465673 0.3617246 8.519961
# Run fixed effects meta-analysis,
# account for correlation
LS( df$beta, df$se, C)
#> beta se p
#> 1 1.153794 0.175376 4.737006e-11
# Run random effects meta-analysis,
# account for correlation
RE2C( df$beta, df$se, C)
#> stat1 stat2 RE2Cp RE2Cp.twoStep QE QEp Isq
#> 1 43.28292 0.2068769 1.53742e-10 NA 5.473035 0.174815 38.51018